Influence of the Bed Head Positioning on the Current Expiratory Volume of Pediatric Patients in Mechanical Ventilation: A Pilot Clinical Controlled Trial
Author(s) : Camila Gemin R. Locatelli 1 , Valéria Cabral Neves 1 , Adriana Koliski 1 and José Eduardo Carreiro 1
1 Pediatric Intensive Care Unit , Federal University of Parana , Brazil
Open J Pediatr Neonatol
Article Type : Research Article
The elevated bed head position is an important therapeutic intervention that can reduce respiratory complications associated with mechanical ventilation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of elevation at the head of the bed on the tidal volume, pressure variables, hemodynamic data and peripheral oxygen saturation in pediatric patients on mechanical ventilation. Methods: In a before-and-after clinical trial, 52 patients of both sexes, with a chronological age of 28 days to 14 years old, were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit for more than 24 hours. These were positioned at 0º, 30º, 45º and 60º of elevation of the head of the bed. For each position, the expiratory tidal volume, pressure variables, hemodynamic data and peripheral oxygen saturation were evaluated.
Results: The patients presented an increase in the expired tidal volume, with the bed head angulation at 30º and 45º. Heart rate increased when the head was positioned at 60º. The peripheral oxygen saturation variable increased in the 30º and 45º positions. The systolic blood pressure variables and diastolic blood pressure showed a progressive increase in the 30º, 45º and 60º positions respectively. Significant effects on increasing the SatO2/FiO2 ratio were observed in the 30º and 45º positions. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a significant increase in expired tidal volume and an increase in the SatO2/FiO2 ratio with the patient positioned at 30º and 45º of elevation of the head of the bed. The peripheral oxygen saturation variable increased in the 30º and 45º positions. The elevated bed head position should be considered when monitoring children during mechanical ventilation.
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Patient Positioning; Mechanical Ventilation
Figure 1: Data collection flowchart.
Statistical Analysis
In the period of the study, 153 patients admitted and 89 (58.1%) required invasive ventilator support. In the present study, 78 patients were recruited, but only 52 met the inclusion criteria. The other 26 patients were excluded because mechanical ventilation was withdrawn within 24 hours. The main indication for mechanical ventilation was respiratory failure. The median time on mechanical ventilation was seven and a half days. Of the 52 patients included in the study, 22 (42.3%) were female and 30 (57.7%) male, with a median age of 16.5 months, ranging from 1.0 to 132.0 months (95% CI = 30.96 - 45.81). The patients' diagnoses on admission were: 38 (73.1%) acute respiratory failure; 10 (19.2%) postoperative; 4 (7.7%) others (1 foreign body aspiration, 1 snakebite accident and 2 states of non-convulsive illness). The epidemiological characteristics of the studied sample are shown in Table 1.
Characteristics | Study group(n=52) | |
Sex F/M (n) | 22/30 | |
Age¹ (months) | 16,5 (5,0-44,0) | |
Wheight¹ (kg) | 9,5 (6,5-13,3) | |
Diagnosis | Acute respiratory failure (n,%) | 38 (73,1%) |
Post-operative (n,%) | 10 (19,2%) | |
Others (n,%) | 4 (7,7%) | |
Source: The author (2021). | ||
Note: ¹Values expressed as median and 25-75% percentiles. F: female; M: male. |
Table 1: Epidemiological characteristics of the sample in the pediatric intensive care unit.
Parameters |
Study
group(n=52) |
|
Peak pressure (cmH2O) ¹ |
22,4 ± 4,9 |
|
Final expiratory pressure (cmH2O)
¹ |
9,2 ± 1,8 |
|
Respiratory rate (rpm) ¹ |
19,9 ± 2,6 |
|
Inspired oxygen fraction (%) ² |
40,0 (30,0-50,0) |
|
Inspiratory time (sec) ¹ |
0,8 ± 0,1 |
|
Sensitivity (cmH2O) ¹ |
-2,1 ± 0,5 |
|
Mechanical ventilation days² |
7,5 (5,0 - 11,0) |
|
Source: The author
(2021). |
||
Note: ¹Values
expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ²Values expressed as median and
25-75% percentiles. cmH2O: centimeters of water. |
Graph 1 illustrates the behavior of expiratory tidal volume according to the patient's predicted weight. It was observed that at 30º and 45º of elevation of the head of the bed, the tidal volume showed a significant increase.
Table 3 shows the values of peak inspiratory pressure, plateau pressure, mean airway pressure and pulmonary distention pressure, during bedside positions. There was no statistically significant difference for these variables.
Variables |
0º |
30º |
45º |
60º |
p |
Peak pressure¹ |
24,80 ± 5,02 |
24,61 ± 5,03 |
24,59 ± 5,35 |
24,94±5,16 |
0,10 |
Plateau pressure¹ |
21,09 ± 4,29 |
21,36 ± 4,46 |
21,36 ± 4,48 |
21,34±4,46 |
0,84 |
Mean airway pressure¹ |
13,82 ± 2,48 |
13,89 ± 2,47 |
13,85 ± 2,49 |
13,92±2,47 |
0,85 |
Pulmonary distention pressure¹ |
11,98 ± 3,64 |
12,07 ± 3,69 |
12,19 ± 3,87 |
12,23±3,75 |
0,57 |
Source: The author
(2021). |
|||||
Note: Data
presented as mean ± standard deviation. Test: ANOVA, Post-hoc: Bonferroni.
¹Values expressed in cmH20 (centimeters of water). |
Table 3: Peak pressure, plateau pressure, average airway pressure and pulmonary distention pressure, pediatric intensive care unit.
Table 4 shows the behavior of hemodynamic data and peripheral oxygen saturation during bedside positioning. Heart rate increased when the head was positioned at 60º; the peripheral oxygen saturation variable increased in the 30º and 45º positions; and, the variables systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure showed a progressive increase in the 30º, 45º and 60º positions. All of these changes were statistically significant.
Variables |
0º |
30º |
45º |
60º |
p |
FC (bpm) |
136,13 ± 28,17 |
136,01 ± 28,10 |
137,36 ± 28,88 |
138,40 ± 29,27* |
0,01* |
FR (rpm) |
20,01 ± 2,37 |
20,01 ± 2,37 |
20,01 ± 2,37 |
20,01 ± 2,37 |
----- |
SpO2(%) |
96,09 ± 4,00 |
96,61 ± 3,77* |
96,61 ± 3,69* |
96,25 ± 3,42 |
0,01* |
PAS (mmHg) |
97,84 ± 19,73 |
99,40 ± 20,36* |
102,96 ± 17,89* |
103,25 ± 19,15* |
<0,01* |
PAD (mmHg) |
55,03 ± 15,82 |
56,34 ± 15,70* |
61,05 ± 16,71* |
61,38 ± 15,83* |
<0,01* |
Source: The author
(2021). |
|||||
Note: Data
presented as mean ± standard deviation. ANOVA test, Post-hoc: Bonferroni, *
p?0.01. HR: heart rate, bpm: beats per minute, FR: respiratory rate, rpm: breaths
per minute, SpO2: peripheral oxygen saturation, SBP: systolic blood pressure,
DBP: diastolic blood pressure, mmHg: millimeters of mercury. |
Table 4: Hemodynamic data and peripheral oxygen saturation, pediatric intensive care unit.
Graph 2 demonstrates the behavior of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio during the headboard positions, with a statistically significant increase in the 30º and 45º positions.
Graph 2: SPO2/FIO2 ratio in the 0º, 30º, 45º and 60º position of bed heading.
Source: The Author (2021).
Note: Test: Friedman's ANOVA, Post-hoc: Wilcoxon.
The study demonstrated a significant increase in expired tidal volume with patients positioned at 30º and 45º of head elevation. There were no significant changes in the pressure parameters of mechanical ventilation. The peripheral oxygen saturation variable increased in the 30º and 45º. And the SatO2/FiO2 ratio increased significantly with the head elevation at 30º and 45º.
1. Martinez BP. Influence of Different Degrees of Head Elevation on Respiratory Mechanics in Mechanically Ventilated Patients. Revbras Ter Intensiva. 2015;27:347-352.
2. Duff JP, Rosychuk RJ, Joffe AR. The Safety and Efficacy of Sustained Inflations as a Lung Recruitment Maneuver in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients. Intensive care med. 2007;33:1778-1786.
3. Neves VC, Koliski A, Giraldi DJA. Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver in Children Submitted to Mechanical Ventilation in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Revbras Ter Intensiva. 2009;21:453-460.
4. Brazilian Consensus On mechanical ventilation. J Braspneumol. 2007;33:S54-S70.
5. Junior CAF. Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatrics: Basic concepts. Rev med Minas Gerais. 2014;28:S4-S104.
6. Gupta R, Rosen D. Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation in The Intensive Care Unit. Bja Education. 2016;16:422-426.
7. Vidal S, Pérez A, Eumesekian P. Fluid Balance And Length Of Mechanical Ventilation in Children Admitted To A Single Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Archargent pediatr. 2016;114:313-318.
8. Guérin C. Prone Positioning in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N eng j med. 2013;368:2159-2168.
9. Drakulovic MB. Supine Body Position as A Risk Factor For Nosocomial Pneumonia In Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Randomized Trial. Lancet. 1999;354:1851–1858.
10. Grap MJ. Effect of Backrest Elevation on The Development of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Am J Crit Care. 2005;14:325-332.
11. Göcze I, Strenge F, Zeman, F. The Effects of The Semi Recumbent Position On Hemodynamic Status In Patients On Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: Prospective Randomized Multi Variable Analysis. Critical Care. 2013;17:1-9.
12. Llaurado-Serra M. Evaluationo Head-of-Bed Elevation Compliance In Critical Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation In A Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit. Med intensive. 2015;39(6):329-336.
13. Barton G, Vanderspank-Wright B, Shea J. Optimizing Oxygenation in The Mechanically Ventilated Patient: Nursing Practice Implications. Crit care nursclin. 2016;28:425-435.
14. Niël-Weise BS, Gastmeier P, Kola A. Na Evidence-based Recommendation on Bed Head Elevation for Mechanically Ventilated Patients. Critical care. 2011;15:1-9.
15. Costa DC, Rocha E, Ribeiro TF. Association of Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers and Prone Position In Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Revbras Ter Intensive. 2009;21:197-203.
16. Cakar N. Time Required For Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen Equilibration During Mechanical Ventilation After A Step Change In Fractional Inspired Oxygen Concentration. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:655-659.
17. Farias JA. What is The Daily Practice of Mechanical Ventilation In Pediatric Intensive Care Units? A Multicenter Study. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:918-925.
18. Lanetzki CS. The Epidemiological Profile of The Pediatric Intensive Care Center at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Einstein. 2012;10:16-21.
19. Alves MVMFF. Profile of Patients Admitted to A Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of A Teaching Hospital In The Interior Of São Paulo. Cienccuid Saúde. 2014;13:294-301.
20. Batista NOW, et al. Clinical-Epidemiological Profile of Hospitalised Patientsin Paediatric Intensive Care Unit. J Hum Grow Dev. 2015;25:187-193.
21. Randolph AG, et al. The Feasibility of Conducting Clinical Trials In Infants And Children With Acute Respiratory Failure. Am j respire crit care med. 2003;167:1334-1340.
22. Gupta R, Rosen D. Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation in The Intensive Care Unit. Bja education. 2016;16:422-426.
23. Palicc. Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Consensus Recommendations from The Pediatric Acutelunginjury Consensus Conference. Pediatr crit care med. 2015;16:428-439.
24. Wolfler A, et al. Daily Practice of Mechanical Ventilation In Italian Pediatric Intensive Care Units: A Prospective Survey. Pediatr crit care med. 2011;12:141-146.
25. Seiberlich E, et al. Protective Mechanical Ventilation, Why Use It?. Rev bras anestesiol. 2011;61:659-667.
26. Rotta AT, Steinhorn DM. Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatrics. J pediatr. 2007;83:s100-s108.
27. Khemani RG, et al. Effect of tidal volume in children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Intensive care med. 2009;35:1428-1437.
28. Assmann CB, et al. lung Hyperinflation With Mechanical Ventilator Versus Isolated Tracheal Aspiration In Bronchial Hygiene Of Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation. Rev bras ter intensive. 2016;28:27-32.
29. Mahdav A, et al. Comparison of The Peak Inspiratory Pressure and Lung Dynamic Compliance Between A Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway and Anendo Tracheal Tube in Children Under Mechanical Ventilation. Tanaffos. 2017;16:289-294.
30. Barbas CSV, et al. Brazilian Recommendations for Mechanical Ventilation 2013. Part i. Revbras Ter Intensive. 2014;26:89-121.
31. Amato MBP, et al. Driving Pressure and Survival In The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:747-755.
32. Georgopoulos D, et al. Driving Pressure During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation. Respir Physiol Neurobiol . 2016;8:484-493.
33. Rajendra AU, et al. Heart Rate Variability: A Review. Med Bio Eng Comput. 2006;44:1031-1035.
34. Vanderlei lCM. Basic Notions of Heart Rate Variability and Its Clinical Applicability. Rev Bra Scir Cardio Vasc. 2009;24:205-217.
35. Polito MD, Farinatti PTV. Considerations About Blood Pressure Measurement in Resistance Exercises. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003;9:25-33.
36. Helayel PE, et al. SPO2-SAO2 Gradient During Mechanical Ventilation in Anesthesia and Intensive Care. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2001;51:305-310.
37. Rice TW, et al. Comparison of The SPO2/FIO2 ratio and the PAO2/FIO2 Ratio In Patients With Acute Lung Injury or Ards. Chest. 2007;132:410-417.
Corresponding Author: Camila Gemin R. Locatelli, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba (PR), Brazil.
Copyright: © 2021 All copyrights are reserved by Camila Gemin R. Locatelli, published by Coalesce Research Group. This This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.