Social Psychiatry

Social Psychiatry finds to work out the many realities in family and society which influence modification as disclosed through the studies of individuals or groups operating in their natural setting. It presumes that each individual is effective which most persons possess potentialities that are never fully realized due to personal emotional or social interferences. Social Psychiatry is etiological in its aim, but its point of attack is that the whole social framework of up to date living. Social psychiatry deals with social factors associated with psychiatric morbidity, social effects of mental illness, psycho-social disorders and social approaches to psychiatric care. First, it's provided us with evidence about the impact of social forces upon psychological state . Second, it has enjoyed substantial inter-disciplinary cooperation. Apart from socially- orientated psychiatrists, the project can boast high profile contributions from nurses, clinical psychologists and social workers. At times, some sociologists, such as George Brown, have played a leading role. However, there are many signs that whilst social psychiatry may not be on its last legs it has certainly seen better days. A crucial aspect of its demise has been the recent failure, compared to earlier days, to draw on insights from the social sciences. A good starting point to begin to examine the trajectory of social psychiatry and assess its future prospects is the breakdown in collaboration between the disciplines of psychiatry and sociology. The theoretical and methodological preferences of the 2 approaches to psychological state problems in society became discrepant. In the past this was not the case and the influence of sociological ideas was clearly evident in the field of social psychiatry and epidemiology. For example, the second generation of research on inequalities in psychological state , which happened immediately after the Second war , saw the emergence of a variety of influential studies, which demonstrated a consistent social patterning of mental health problems. This profusing and fertile relationship between sociology and mental epidemiology was established on a shared receipt of the delicacy of build of mental disease and consequently the strengths of the different ways of observing mental ''disorder''. Psychiatry is accepted a disease which is not generally marked by physical signs, the sociologist's concepts of impairment or disability marked by social dysfunctions could be the key to unraveling the rates of mental illness.

Support Links

Track Your Article

Twitter Tweets