Ecology, reservoir, vectors, and transmission of Mycobacterium ulcerans
The successful growth of M. ulcerans from Gerris sp. (Water Strider), an aquatic Hemiptera, provided a factual evidence of the presence of M. ulcerans in the environment [20]. The use of PCR based techniques has implicated environmental agents such soil, water plants, detritus, plant/biofilms, frogs, snails, turtles, fish, water filtrates, mosquitoes (Anopheles sp., Aedes sp., Coquillettidia sp. and Culex sp.) and aquatic insects (Naucoridae, Hydrophilidae, Belastomatidae) in many BU endemic areas as potential reservoir or vectors of M. ulcerans [16,21,22-30]. This suggests that the aquatic ecosystem/habitat could be the source of M. ulcerans from which it is transmitted to humans and possibly the vehicle for disseminating M. ulcerans strains in endemic communities. However, the transmission routes of M. ulcerans from the environment to humans/animals are still unclear but remain very speculative.
A conceptual hypothesis described by Portaels et al. and Marion et al. has been used to explain the possible M. ulcerans transmission mode. According to this hypothesis, M. ulcerans found in water, mud, water filtrates, detritus, and plant biofilms are picked and accumulated by filtering or grazing aquatic insects (such as mosquito larvae, midges, and water bugs) or other invertebrates (crustaceans, snails, plankton) during feeding. The invertebrate is then fed on by predatory aquatic invertebrates (beetles, dragonfly larvae, and true bugs) and vertebrates (fish, frogs), which are also fed on by aquatic insects capable of flight and Birds which disperse M. ulcerans to another aquatic environment. Humans are infected with M. ulcerans through direct contact with these potential reservoirs/vectors via skin abrasions or through insect bites [21,25,31]. BU patients living under poor hygienic conditions or those with large ulcerative lesions (category III) can help disseminate M. ulcerans in the environment through their activities such as bathing, washing of clothes, and swimming in water bodies albeit human to human transmission is rare [29,32,33]. The occurrence of BU lesions in domestic mammal species (dogs, cats, horses) and native wildlife (koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus), Alpacas, ringtail (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) and brushtail possums (Trichosurus cunninghami)) have been widely observed in Australia, suggesting that these animals could also be a major link between the environment and human in the transmissions of M. ulcerans [16]. However, in endemic countries such as Ghana, Cameroon, and Côte d’Ivoire where the endemicity of BU is high, few cases have been found or reported in domestic mammal species such as a dog, a goat, and few Mice (Mastomys sp.) [28,33,34].
Fyfe and his colleagues postulated that domestic animals get infected with M. ulcerans via contact with infected soils, environmental samples, or fecal matter of wild/ other domestic animals. Humans are then infected through direct contact with infected animal excreta or Animal bites. Ectoparasites of domestic animals that feed on humans can also transmit M. ulcerans from animals to humans. An insect vector particularly mosquitoes could transfer M. ulcerans from possum to humans during feeding. In addition, mosquitoes breeding sites (gutters, ponds, or drains) heavily contaminated with possum excreta harboring M. ulcerans can facilitate mosquitoes (either as adults or larvae or) to be infected with M. ulcerans [16]. However, this hypothesis cannot be extended to Africa, as studies are yet to found evidence of adult mosquitoes harboring and possibly transmitting M. ulcerans to humans. Also, animal excreta being the vehicle for dispersing M. ulcerans in the environment is yet to be proven in Africa [35,36]. The prevailing dogma with regard to the transmission of BU is that the environmental reservoir of M. ulcerans is either an abiotic or biotic component of aquatic and/terrestrial ecosystems and that there exist multiple transmission pathways dependent on the epidemiological setting and geographical areas [16,33,37]
Seasonality of Buruli Ulcer Disease
Outbreaks of Buruli ulcer in humans have been linked to close proximity to aquatic systems such slow-flowing or stagnant water bodies created by human activities [38]. Flooding of lakes during heavy rainfall, creation of dams/agriculture irrigation system on stream/rivers, modifying wetlands, deforestation, and agriculture activities resulting in increased flooding and alluvial, pit, and sand mining operations have been associated with high BU incidence in endemic communities [25,38,39]. These environmental disturbances are known to redistribute M. ulcerans in the environment increases the possibility of human contact with the pathogens.
There exist an interplay between ecosystem (habitat) changes and climatic patterns which result in both functional and abiotic environmental changes in biodiversity [3]. Studies have reported climatic/rainfall patterns to result in a cyclical incidence of MU/BU in many endemic communities (Table 1). During heavy rainfall/flooding, M. ulcerans in aquatic habitat are washed into and surface runoff water thereby contaminate them. In the dry season, these waterbodies move back leading to the formation of stagnant/small water bodies near urban and agricultural areas [3]. These events lead to a cyclic transformation of the ecosystem resulting in the creation of new ecological niches characterized by stagnation of water, increased amount of light in surface water, high water temperatures, and increase the acidity of water. These changes are accompanied by sedimentation (turbidity), growth of the aquatic plant and algal biofilm formation, decrease ultraviolet light, and dissolve oxygen which favors the growth, persistence, and transmission of M. ulcerans in the environment [3]. These changes also affect the composition of the aquatic ecosystem leading to a turnover of biotic communities favoring the species adapted to lentic habitats. Such aquatic systems are prone to M. ulcerans as well as human activities such as building, fishing, washing of clothes and hunting which increases the likelihood of human contact with M. ulcerans in the environment [40,41].
M. ulcerans exhibits major seasonal and intra-seasonal variations in large water bodies and temporarily flooded areas with its presence less variable between seasons in permanent swamps and streams [42]. Peak incidence of M. ulcerans DNA in crayfish has been observed to be in the summer season which comes right after the rainy season in Japan [43]. These findings correlate with studies conducted in Northern Malawi and Cameroon [31,44]. In Louisiana, USA, M. ulcerans DNA was abundant in the wet seasons than in fall and winter [45]. The link between M. ulcerans presence in the environment and Buruli ulcer seasonal pattern in the human population has been explored [17-19]. In Australia, Fyfe and his colleagues observed a positive correlation between human BU cases and the presence of M. ulcerans DNA in possum feces [16]. Williamson and colleagues also reported a positive correlation between M. ulcerans DNA presence in the environment and BU occurrence among humans [18]. In Ghana, the months with a high amount of rainfall are known to record the highest amount of M. ulcerans DNA in the environment which corresponds to the high incidence of BU in the human population compared to the dry season [17]. Genomic profiling of both M. ulcerans DNA detected in BU patients and environmental samples show a very close genetic relationship of M. ulcerans in the same niche [16,28,30]. In addition, BU lesions in patients were source tracked to water bodies present in endemic communities in Ghana [28]. These provide evidence that BU patients are infected by M. ulcerans present in the environment individuals are constantly exposed to.
Place of Study
|
Year
|
Sample used
|
Season with peak
incidence of BU or MU
|
Reference
|
Uganda
|
1969-1970
|
Clinical samples
|
Rainy season
|
[46]
|
Uganda
|
1966-1970
|
Clinical samples
|
Rainy season
|
[47]
|
Ghana
|
1993
|
Clinical samples
|
Rainy season
|
[48]
|
Northern Malawi
|
2006
|
Environment
samples
|
Dry Season
|
[44]
|
Australia
|
1981-2008
|
Clinical samples
|
Wet season
|
[49]
|
USA
|
2010
|
Environmental
samples
|
Wet season
|
[45]
|
Cameroon
|
2010
|
Environmental
samples
|
Dry season
|
[31]
|
Cameroon
|
2002-2012
|
Clinical samples
|
Rainy season
|
[50]
|
French Guiana
|
1969-2012
|
Clinical samples
|
Dry season
|
[19]
|
Japan
|
2015
|
Environment
samples
|
Rainy season
|
[43]
|
Ghana
|
2016
|
Environment
samples
|
Rainy season
|
[17]
|
Australia
|
2004-2016
|
Clinical samples
|
Rainy season
|
[51]
|
Table1: Summary of studies indicating season with peaked Buruli ulcer cases or M. ulcerans DNA in respective countries.
In Australia and French Guiana, it was observed that warmer and wet conditions before case emergence followed by a dry period to case emergence is a precursor to the occurrence of BU [19,49]. It was hypothesized that flooding during the rainy season influences the distribution of M. ulcerans in the environment leading to the infection of humans with clinical signs showing at the onset of the dry season similar to an earlier observation made in Uganda by Radford [49,52]. This phenomenon of high BU cases in the subsequent dry season and this lag phase can be attributed to the long incubation period of BU (estimated between 3-4.5 months) resulting in the delays between infection and diagnosis [49,53,54]. However, in a recent study conducted in Australia, high BU-incidents were observed in Bellarine and Mornington Peninsulas, in months with high rainfalls as compared to months with less rainfall [51]. These findings confirm observations earlier studies conducted in Cameroon and Uganda where a high number of cases were also reported during months with high rainfall compared to others with low rainfall [46,47,50]. In Ghana, it has been revealed that BU cases peaked from September to October which is a minor rainy season in the country [48]. A potential issue that may be a hindrance to understanding the seasonal patterns of BU in humans is the difference in time between the appearance of symptoms, reporting to health facilities as reflected in the size of lesion presented [19]. However, the variation of Buruli ulcer incidence by season can be associated with fluctuations of Mycobacterium ulcerans occurrences in the environment which are probably influenced by the dynamics of freshwater ecosystems [50]. There is the trend of BU/ M. ulcerans peak incidence to be associated with rainfall and period just after the wet season. This requiring that during these periods, BU control programs such as community case search activities in endemic communities should be intensified so as to enable early detection of cases to allow prompt treatment. This would prevent the various forms of deformities, disability, or even amputation of the affected Limb which commonly occur when BU lesions are not treated early. In addition, there ought to be intensive public education on BU protective measures such as Wearing long protective cloths, washing, and immediate application of alcohol at wounds [17,55].
Globally, there is a downward trend (64% reduction) in the incidence of Buruli ulcers in most endemic countries with the main reason for the reduction unknown [1]. However, we can speculate that this reduction in BU cases can be a result of the global warming effect which is known to affect rainfall patterns (reduction in rainfall). This speculation is based on this review, showing a high incidence of Buruli ulcer/M. ulcerans during the period of high precipitation. However, we suggest that the seasonal patterns of BU/ M. ulcerans may be dependent on the epidemiological settings and geographical areas similar to its transmission’s mode due to the differences in climatic conditions.