Author(s) : Yeganeh Davoudi 1 , Minoo Mahmoodi 1 , Masoud Ghorbani 2 , Mohammad Ali Nilforoushzade 3 4 and Rahim Ahmadi 1
1 Department of Biology , Islamic Azad University , Iran
2 Department of Research and Development , Pasteur Institute of Iran , Iran
3 , Jordan Dermatology and Hair Transplantation Center , Iran
4 Skin and Stem Cell Research Center , Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Iran
Open J Pharma Sci
Article Type : Research Article
Mesenchymal stem cells; Atopic dermatitis; Subcutaneous; IgE; Mast cells.
Isolation and culture of hAT-MSCs
Human adipose tissues were obtained by simple liposuction from freshly excised human fat tissue with informed consent. Subcutaneous adipose tissues were digested with 0/1% collagenase (type I, Gibco) under gentle agitation for 30 minutes at 370 C. The digested tissues were filtered through a 100 µm nylon mesh to remove cellular debris and were centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 10 min to obtain a pellet. The pellet was resuspended cells in DMEM (Invitrogen)-based media containing 0,2 mM ascorbic acid and 15% Fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cell suspension was re-centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and the cell pellet was collected. The cell fraction was cultured overnight at 370 C 5% CO2 in DMEM- based media containing 0,2mM ascorbic acid and 15% FBS. After 24h, the cell adhesion was checked under an inverted microscope, and non-adherent cells were removed by washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The cells were maintained for 2-3 days until confluent (passage 0). When the cells reached 90% confluency, they were used in this study. Given that hAT-MSCs isolated from 8 different donors were used after verification of characteristics for MSCs by observing the surface markers and differentiation capabilities.
Reagents
1- Fluoro-2, 4-dinitrobenzene (DNFB) from merckInc (Germany). N-terminal amino acids of proteins and peptides. PBS, PS, Fungizone, DMEM, FBS, L_Glutamine, Dispase, Trypsine, Collagenase, DMSO, ELISA kit, MTT assay kit, CD44, CD90, CD34, CD45, Hypotonic ammonium chloride, Sodium dodecyl sulfate, Osteoblast differentiation medium, Chondroblast differentiation medium, toluidine blue, H&E, Alizarin red, Ketamine, were purchased from sigma Aldrich.
Mice
NC/Nga mice (male, 8wk old) were used for the experiments. Animal care and all experimental procedures were approved by and followed the regulations of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. They were obtained from Pasteur Institute and group housed in wire mesh cages under specific pathogen free conditions in the animal care facility.
AD model induction in NC/Nga mice
Atopic dermatitis (AD) was induced as previously method described with some modifications [27, 28, and 29]. We used 8 mice per group. Briefly, the upper backs of the mice were shaved with a clipper. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (4%, 150 µl/head) was treated on the shaved dorsal skin including surfaces of ears to achieve skin barrier disruption. After 3-4 hours, in a volume of 150 µl DNFB (Merck, Inc) was topically applied. 1-Fluoro-2, 4-dinitrobenzene (DNFB) was treated 3 times a week for 3-week intervals (i.e., days 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24). Thereafter, hAT-MSCs (0/75 × 105 or 0/375 × 105 cells/200 µl normal saline) were subcutaneously injected into mice on days 32, 40, 48, and 56 (figure 1A). After sacrifice on day 64, sera and skin biopsy specimens were obtained to detect the concentration of total IgE using a commercial ELISA kit (Zell Bio) or to evaluate histopathological lesions, respectively. Mast cells in skins were determined by toluidine blue.
Image j analysis to assess lesions area
To investigate changes in lesions surface area, and measure the percentage of lesions reduction, on different days (8, 16, after treatment) during the treatment period, the surface of the lesions using image j software with cm2 unit. The surface of the lesions was first photographed with a digital camera under the same conditions, then using image j software, the size of the lesions was calculated with high accuracy.
Histopathological evaluation
Skin samples were collected, fixed in 10% formalin followed by consecutive tissue processing steps including alcohol-xylene changes, and embedding in paraffin. Sections of 5 µm thicknesses were prepared and stained with H&E or toluidine blue. Mast cell infiltration was determined by toluidine blue staining.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Prism5 and excels software (Microsoft Office 2013). For quantitative data analysis, One Way ANOVA in case of cluster comparison was applied. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Subcutaneous administration of hAT-MSCs reduces the symptoms of DNFB- induced atopic dermatitis in mice.
We first investigated whether the xenogeneic administration of hAT-MSCs could exert a therapeutic effect against DNFB-induced murine AD. To assess the therapeutic effects, two different doses (low dose: 0/375 × 105 ;high dose:0/75 × 105 ) of hAT-MSCs were injected subcutaneously at day 32 when AD was fully induced (figure 1A). Phosphate buffer saline (PBS) was infused as a cell control group. None of the mice that received hAT-MSCs showed any adverse events or lethality. Interestingly, subcutaneous administration of high dose hAT-MSCs significantly reduced the clinical severity of AD mice.
The hAT-MSCs suppress AD in the mouse model.
We aimed to exclude the xenogeneic rejection response in this AD mouse model. Therefore, we used human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. It is now generally accepted that MSCs are hypo immunogenic as they do not express MHC class II activity [30]. We used the DNFB-induced AD mice models that were subcutaneously sensitized with 150 µl of DNFB on days 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24. The hAT-MSCs (0/375 × 105 or 0/75 × 105) were then subcutaneously injected 4 times for 4weeks (Figure 1A). Decreased cell infiltration in the skin was observed in mice treated with both high dose and low dose hAT-MSCs compared with that in the PBS control group (Figure 1B). The severity score of skin lesions was significantly decreased by hAT-MSCs (Figure 1C).
Figure 1: Therapeutic effect of s.c. injected hAT-MSCs in AD mice. (AD)
Atopic dermatitis was induced by the repetitive application of 1-Fluoro-2, 4-dinitrobenzene (DNFB ) on day 24, after the onset of disease. Two different doses of hAT-MSCs or phosphate buffer saline (PBS) were injected subcutaneously (s.c).
(A) Scheme of AD induction and cell injection.
(B) Photographs of skin gross lesions were taken for pathological evaluation
(C) Lesions surface area on different days (8, 16, after treatment) during the recovery period on control and treatment groups.
Mast cells were identified by toluidine blue. These cells were also significantly decreased by hAT-MSCs (Figure 2B and 2C). The total and DNFB- specific IgE levels were significantly decreased in sera of mice treated with both high dose and low dose hAT-MSCs. These results indicate therapeutic effects on AD by xenogeneic hAT-MSCs in two doses, high and low.
In the present study, we demonstrate for the first time that subcutaneous administration of xenogeneic hAT-MSCs can alleviate DNFB-induced AD in mice, probably by decreasing the number of mast cells (MCs) and the concentration of IgE. Several recent studies have shown that MSCs can prevent allergic airway inflammation [31-33]. Frequently, immunologic mechanisms of AD are characterized by dominant Th2-mediated abnormal inflammatory responses and elevated serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) and eosinophils [34,35].MCs, as well as DCs, express Fc?RI and specific IgE- bearing MCs. Called sensitized MCs, are abundant in AD lesion. Upon exposure to the specific allergen. IgE-mediated MC degranulation results in the release of performed inflammatory mediators, such as histamine, serotonin, PG and leukotrienes, which contribute to disease exacerbation through the itch-scratch cycle and inflammatory processes through the recruitment of eosinophils and lymphocytes into the dermis [36]. We showed in this study that xenogeneic subcutaneous administration of hAT-SCs into mouse models to be well- tolerated and sufficiently effective, we state precisely in this regard that hAT-MSCs can favorably exert cross-species immunosuppressive effects. Studies in this field have also been conducted by other researchers [37]. Furthermore, we revealed that the subcutaneous administration of hAT-MSCs not only decreased the serum level of IgE but significantly reduced the number of mast cells (MCs). Scuderi et al. showed that subcutaneous injection of autologous AT-derived MSCs ( AT-MSCs ) with hyaluronic acid ( HA ) scaffold resulted in the significant improvement of skin symptoms in patients with SSc, and the number of passages for injected MSCs, was between 2 and 3 [38].Previous studies showed that subcutaneously (SC) administered human UCB-derived MSCs (hUCB-MSCs) can effectively ameliorate the experimental mouse model of AD [39] as well as psoriasis [40]. In addition, subcutaneous injection of allogeneic hUCB-MSCs represented promising clinical efficacy and safety in patients with moderate - to- severe AD [41]. When both high dose (0/75 × 105 ) and low dose (0/375 × 105 ) of hAT-MSCs were subcutaneously administered in DNFB-induced AD, cell infiltration into the skin lesions and the level of IgE production in sera were significantly decreased as compared with those observed in the PBS- treated control mice. Administration of the high dose of hAT-MSCs appeared to be better for the therapeutic effects of the AD than the low dose of hAT-MSCs. However, both doses of hAT-MSCs significantly decreased total IgE production in sera and number of mast cells (MCs). We demonstrate for the first time that subcutaneous administration of xenogeneic hAT-MSCs did not exhibit any embolism-related, clumped cells-related symptoms, supporting the safety of hAT-MSCs. Our findings along with the human clinical trial data could open the door for the development of a new therapeutic strategy to treat AD patients.
Conclusions
MSC-based cell therapy has been spotlighted as a promising approach for the treatment of inflammatory skin disorders, and relevant clinical trials are ongoing. Human AdMSCs can be isolated from small amounts of adipose tissue, efficiently expanded to achieve more than 109 cells after 3 to 4 passages independent on donor age and disease status. In this study, we proved that a subcutaneous administration of hAT-MSCs can be successfully used for the treatment of AD and is well tolerated without any safety issues.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
I thank Dr.Mehrak. Zare from Skin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran university of Medical sciences for isolation and culture of human adipose Tissue- mesenchymal stem cells
1. Asari S, Itakura S,
Ferreri K, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells suppress
B-cellterminal differentiation. ExpHematol. 2009;37:604-615.
2. PrigioneI, BenvenutoF,
BoccaP, et al. Reciprocal interactions
between human mesenchymal stemcells and gamma delta T-cells or invariant
natural killer T cells. Stem cells. 2009;27:693-702.
3. Ren G, Zhang L, Zhao X, et
al. Mesenchymal stem
cell-mediated immune suppression occurs via concerted action of chemokines and
nitricoxide.
Cell stem cell. 2008;2:141-150.
4. Zhang B, Liu R, Shi D, et
al. Mesenchymal stem cells
induce matured endritic cells into an ovel Jagged-2-dependent regulatory
dendritic cell population. Blood. 2009;113:46-57.
5. NaUta AJ, Fibbe WE. Immuno modulatory
properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. Blood. 2007;110:3499-3506.
6. Oh JY, Kim MK, Shin MS, et
al. The anti-inflammatory
and anti angiogenic role of mesenchymal stem cells in corneal wound healing
following chemical injury. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1047-1055.
7. Ankrum J, Karp JM. Mesenchymal stem cell
therapy: two steps forward, one step back. Trends Mol Me. 2010;16:203-209.
8. Choi YH, Kurtz A, Stamm
C. Mesenchymal stem cells
for cardiac cell therapy. Hum Gene Ther. 2011;22:3-17.
9. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM,
Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential
of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284:143-147.
10. Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN,
Reinhardt RL, et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from
adult marrow.
Nature. 2002;418:41-49.
11. Lee OK, Kuo TK, Chen WM,
et al. Isolation of multipotent
mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Blood. 2004;103:1669-1675.
12. Leung DY, Nicklas RA, Li
JT, et al. Disease management of
atopic dermatitis: an updated practice parameter. Joint Task Force on Practice
Parameters.
An Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004;S1-S21.
13. Hamid Q, Boguniewicz M, Leung
DY. Differential in situ
cytokine gene expression in acute versus chronic atopic dermatitis. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:870-876.
14. Misery L. Therapeutic perspectives
in atopic dermatitis.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2010;41:267-271.
15. Berke R, Singh A,
Guralnick M. Atopic dermatitis: an
overview.
Am Fam Physician. 2012;86:35-42.
16. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL,
Berger TG, et al. Guidelines of care for
the management of atopic dermatitis: Part 2. Management and treatment of atopic
dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:116-132.
17. Ring J, Alomar A, Bieber
T, et al. Guidelines for treatment
of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.
2012;26:1045-1060.
18. Berke R, Singh A,
Guralnick M. Atopic dermatitis: an
overview.
Am Fam Physician. 2012;86:35-42.
19. Karussis D, Kassis I. The potential use of
stem cells in multiple sclerosis: an overview of the preclinical experience. Clin Neurol Neurosu.
2008;110:889-896.
20. Kim HS, Yun JW, Shin TH,
et al. Human umbilical cord
blood mesenchymal stemcell-derived PGE2 and TGF-beta1 alleviate a topic
dermatitis by reducing mastcell degranulation. Stem cells.
2015;33:1254-1266.
21. Na K, Yoo HS, Zhang YX, et
al. Bone marrow-derived
clonal mesenchymal stem cells inhibit ovalbumin-induced atopic dermatitis. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1345.
22. Shin TH, Lee BC, Choi SW,
et al. Human adipose tissue derived
mesenchymal stem cells alleviate atopic dermatitis via regulation of B
lymphocyte maturation. Oncotarget. 2017;8:512-522.
23. Mizuno H. Adipose- derived stem
cells for tissue repair and regeneration: ten years of research and a
literature review.
J Nippon Med Sch. 2009;76:56-66.
24. ZUk PA, Zhu M, Ashjian
P, et al. Human adipose tissue is
a source of multipotent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:4279-4295.
25. Sen A, Lea-Currie YR,
Sujkowska D, et al. Adipogenic potential of
human adipose derived stromal cells from multiple donors is heterogeneous. J Cell Biochem. 2001;81:312-319.
26. Mizuno H. Adipose derived stem and stromal cells for cell-
based therapy: current status of preclinical studies and clinical trials. Curr Opin Mol Ther.
2010;12:442-449.
27. JinH, HeR, OyoshiM, et
al. Animal models of atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol.
2009;129:31-40.
28. Yamamoto M, Haruna T,
Yasui K, et al. A novel atopic
dermatitis model induced by topical application with dermatophagoid esfarinae
extract in NC/Nga mice. Allergol Int. 2007;56:139-148.
29. Yun JW, Seo JA, Jang WH,
et al. Antipruritic effects of
TRPV1 antagonist in murine atopic dermatitis and itching models. J Invest Dermatol.
2011;131:1576-1579.
30. Ryan JM, Barry FP,
Murphy JM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells
avoid allogeneic rejection. J Inflamm (Lond) 2005;2:8.
31. Cho KS, Park HK, Park
HY, et al. IFATS collection:
immunomodulatory effects of adipose tissue- derived stem cells in an allergic
rhinitis mouse model.
Stem Cells. 2009;27:259-265.
32. Kavanagh H, Mahon BP. Allogeneic mesenchymal
stemcells prevent allergic airway inflammation by inducing murine regulatory T
cells.
Allergy. 2011;66:523-531.
33. Nemeth K, Keane-Myers A,
Brown JM, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells
use TGF-beta to suppress allergic responses in a mouse model of ragweed-induced
asthma.
P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:8041.
34. Schneider L, Tilles S,
Lio P, et al. Atopic dermatitis: A practice
parameter update 2012. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131:295-299.
35. Simon D, Braathen LR,
Simon HU. Eosinophils and atopic
dermatitis.
Allergy. 2004;59:561-570.
36. Werfel T, Allam JP,
Biedermann T, et al. Cellular and molecular
immunologic mechanisms in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
2016;138:336-349.
37. Bonfield TL, Nola MT,
Lennon DP, et al. Defining human
mesenchymal stem cell efficacy in vivo. J Inflamm. 2010;7:51.
38. Scuderi N, Ceccarelli S,
Onesti MG, et al. Human adipose- derived
stromal cells for cell- based therapies in the treatment of systemic sclerosis. Cell Transplant. 2013;22:779-795.
39. Kim HS, Yun JW, Shin TH,
et al. Human umbilical cord
blood mesenchymal stem cell- derived PGE2 and TGF- ?1 alleviate atopic
dermatitis by reducing mast cell degranulation. Stem Cells.
2015;33:1254-1266.
40. Sah SK, Park KH, Yun CO,
et al. Effects of human
mesenchymal stem cells transduced with superoxide dismutase on imiquimod-
induced psoriasis- like skin inflammation in mice. Antioxid Redox Signal.
2016;24:233-248.
41. Kim HS, Lee JH, Roh KH, et
al. Clinical trial of human
umbilical cord blood- derived stem cells for the treatment of moderate- to-
severe atopic dermatitis: Phase I/IIa studies. Stem Cells. 2017;35:248-255.
*Corresponding Author: Minoo Mahmoodi, Department of Biology, faculty of Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan Branch, Hamadan, Iran
Copyright: © 2021 All copyrights are reserved by Minoo Mahmoodi, published by Coalesce Research Group. This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.